7 Comments
User's avatar
Pete Ross's avatar

The kid gets the quackzine fever then gets the NSAID then - WOOSH - mush brain. Like a binary weapon.

Everybody knows that the kid is out of the womb only because the pelvis is too narrow; the baby brain is still undergoing embryogenesis until puberty. So this idea to inject heavy metals while artificially inducing a fever & throwing in a potentially organ-devouring prostaglandin inhibitor is totally crazy - if not criminally insane - take your pick.

Expand full comment
Antonio Chaves's avatar

According to a passage in the book "DNA is not Destiny" (by Steven J. Heine) almost all funding for finding the causes of "autism" focuses on the "genetic" causes. Applying for a grant to explore the role of vaccines is a career-killer...

Expand full comment
Pete Ross's avatar

How much could an animal experiments actually cost?

Week-old kittens from the ASPCA for free.

Expand full comment
Antonio Chaves's avatar

Currently they never do placebo trials on humans to test for vaccine safety because they deem it "unethical" to deprive kids getting the placebo the protections supposedly conferred by the vaccines. Consequently, all current safety trials with new vaccines are tested against old vaccines.

Neurobiologist Jonathan Couey (has a podcast called "Gigaohm Biological") proposed the perfect solution: Limit the human placebo trial to two months. This would detect all short-term acute neurological damage caused by the shots. I do not see this happening in the near future because the results are extremely dangerous to the powers-that-be...

Expand full comment
Pete Ross's avatar

1) you need to test quackzine + NSAID vs placebo (not quakzine vs placebo)

2) I suspect that all the kiddie jabs was already secretly phased-out in advance of CovidHoax. That way, nobody will ever know what really happened.

Expand full comment
Antonio Chaves's avatar

The chart does not indicate they phased out the childhood shots, but the controlled opposition (the so-called "medical freedom movement") appear to be paving the for DNA/RNA "vaccines" to replace everything.

Their strategies:

1. Discussing the problems with regular shots (Why didn't they speak out BEFORE the COVID psy-op?).

2. Discussing problems with the DNA/RNA shots in terms of DNA contamination, SV-40 contamination, lipo-nanoparticle, and/or spike protein toxicity while never condemning the DNA/RNA platform itself (Analogy: Marxism is a great, the Soviets just didn't get it right....).

Expand full comment
Pete Ross's avatar

No such thing as RNA or DNA injections. It’s a hoax.

Expand full comment